Is it possible for political hack, Susan Rice to be investigated, indicted, and tried in open court; and for her testimony not to lead back to Hillary Clinton?  Is it possible Hillary Clinton’s courtroom testimony would not lead back to Barack Obama?  Is it possible that Obama’s courtroom testimony would not lead back to the Oligarch handlers he represents?  Not probable.  The trial of Susan Rice leads directly to the indictment and trial of dozens of others; in turn leading to hundreds.  This constitutional crisis is not likely to occur.

I’m excited to see the exuberance of Trump supporters cheering exposure of illegal, seditious, even treasonous behavior of hacks like Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice and others.  (If your news is limited to CNN, NPR, MSNBC, NY Times, Washington Post and the like, you haven’t heard much of anything about this, other than maybe some witch hunt spin.) Loyal Trump supporters and constitutionalists are ecstatic about the indictments and prosecutions sure to come… maybe even as early as tomorrow.  Hope is everywhere in Constitution respecting circles.

Sadly, I suspect this hope is in vain; indictments and prosecutions are not likely.  Hand wringing, tears of agony, flag waving, mud slinging at its best, eloquent pandering like we’ve not seen before, brutal slaps on the wrists, maybe even a Senate reprimand for some; and horror of horrors, the most seditious may have their pensions threatened – but open trials in open courtrooms with focused questioning by trained prosecutors seeking vengeance or justice – uh, uh; small probability here.  The best we can hope for is some will leave office and maybe public life.  This in itself is a win of sorts if we can get it?

No, the D.C. show is completely jinxed; the fix was put in more than a century ago, before most of us were born.  Let’s try to get our arms around the current reality of D.C., which may indirectly shed some light on a few other things we’re wondering about as well.  Don’t focus on Democrats alone.  Other than meaningless rhetoric there is only one Party in D.C. and it’s the Party of the Oligarchs managed jointly by the DNC and RNC.

Clearly, in spite of Democrat protest to the contrary, Donald Trump, his team, many foreign leaders and we’re not sure who else were under covert surveillance by folks in the Obama Administration for more than a year prior to President Trump’s January inauguration.  We’ll omit for now, the question of how many others running for office against Democrats were similarly abused?  Just note where there’s smoke, there’s a fire someplace.  It may have been legal to surveil Mr. Trump and associates, but releasing this information to political operatives for political purposes is felonious.

Please recall that prior to January 20th, 2017, Donald Trump was nothing more than a U.S. citizen.  For the White House to employ Federal government intelligence resources paid for by the American people or to employ outside resources (think plausible denial)  to spy on and potentially undermine political competition running against those currently holding power is despicable at best, illegal under U.S. law and may rise to the level of sedition or even treason at worse.  Anyone not completely dumbed down by public education understands that to preserve our Rule of Law, these subversive political behaviors must be investigated, followed by indictments if warranted and prosecuted where so justified.

Unfortunately, Susan Rice doesn’t work alone.  Neither does Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton or anyone else holding a sliver of power in Washington D.C. on behalf of the Elite; and I’m not limiting these remarks to Democrats, though it’s Democrats under the present microscope.  What we will see play out in the coming weeks is the full on exposition of systemic D.C. corruption so wide and so deep, no decent person can imagine it.  It won’t of course be called corruption by anyone in main stream media.  In Susan Rice’s pathetic case for example, we’ll hear terms like witch hunt, racism, political demagoguery and so forth… but corruption – never, won’t hear that.

It’s possible only 95% or so of the 435 House Members and 100 U.S. Senate Members are fully bought and paid for; but the 5% improbably remaining are too timid and cowardly to make any difference at all, so as a practical matter we can assume 100% of Congress to be thoroughly corrupted by the transnational monopolies who put them in power at the pathological behest of the world’s Oligarchs, thereby serving their own dehumanizing, NWO agenda.

In other words, should Susan Rice, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, George Bush or others of their ilk actually be called to testify, allowed to testify – DO YOU BELIEVE THEIR TESTIMONY WOULDN’T TAKE OTHERS DOWN WITH THEM?  This is key to the whole scheme.  The guilty do not prosecute the guilty and blackmail handles the rest.  To prosecute someone like Hillary Clinton or even a pathetic pawn like Susan Rice in an open court of law… or what we still think of as law today; we’re talking about the probable exposure of fraud, corruption, even treason by a cast of hundreds, maybe thousands throughout Washington D.C., New York, LA and Chicago interlinked with capitals across the world.  Famous people marketed to us on Main Street as respected leaders or philanthropists will be exposed, found out and must in turn be prosecuted.

This prosecution of multitudes is not going to happen — UNTIL AND UNLESS WE THE PEOPLE STAND UP IN MASS, CLAMOR FOR AND DEMAND LEGAL PROSECUTION AND SENTENCING FOR THOSE FOUND GUILTY.  Such a strategy could work, but the bad news is; Establishment Republican Neocons won’t go there; Democrats won’t go there, Neocon or otherwise; and timid, less guilty Congressional Members are afraid to go there.  This leaves Trump, should he stay his course, standing utterly alone with his family and a few close confidants against the Establishment Right, Establishment Left, CIA compromised media, military/industrial complex, “K” Street, corrupted courts, literally thousands of thought conditioned, Federal bureaucrats and millions of largely uninformed U.S. citizens.  Not a pretty picture.

We’ll likely realize in coming days, at least those of us not in a Tavistock induced coma, the once venerable United States of America is a super-power no longer — but has in fact degenerated into a super banana republic hanging on the raw edge of collapse.  Some hand wringing, pandering, speechifying and hand slapping – absolutely – probably months of it.  Indictments and prosecutions – not so much.  On a more positive note – we may not get what we wish from this scenario; but let’s use what we can and forge a foothold toward taking back our government; the one Oligarchs cleverly tricked us out of.

Video  —  Posted: March 30, 2017 in Bruce's Vlog
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

I couldn’t bring myself to cast my own uninformed vote in the 2016 election (1st time in my adult life) as I was disgusted by protected psychopath, Hillary and knew little about The Donald other than having read three or four of his books.  I now suspect it no longer matters whether we like or dislike Donald Trump as President of our United States.  He won election in spite of impossible odds arranged by Left and Right Establishment insiders, a sycophant Elite/CIA controlled media and the Clinton War Machine.  He now assumes responsibility for our United States executive office, supposedly on the people’s behalf, including our monstrously bloated, unimaginably corrupt, $4 trillion Federal on-book budget…and we don’t know how large an off-book budget.

President Trump is not responsible for the vast array of unresolved issues and corruption facing the United States in 2017;  issues developed since WW II;  issues largely ignored, pandered to, propagandized and profited by a few for the last 70 or so years.  The question I find myself asking now is, “WHAT HAPPENS TO US ON MAIN STREET IF DONALD TRUMP FAILS TO MANAGE A SMOOTH ECONOMIC TRANSITION FROM OUR NEARLY INSOLVENT, NON-PRODUCTIVE ECONOMY TO A HEALTHY, PRODUCTIVE ONE”?  Is it still even possible to rebuild responsible adult government – or have we passed the negligently treasonous, economic point of no return?  Maybe we should at least ponder possible answers to this question before jumping on that Trump hating train; the one that looks headed on a downhill track to economic hell?

We’re told by main stream media (MSM) that the U.S. economy is on the right track, but here in Arizona anyway, there sure are a lot of vacant homes, offices, buildings and folks standing on corners with signs; so I did some checking and found U.S. Census Bureau and Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data showing a different picture than the Press Corpse postulates.  Here’s a couple of stats to consider regarding that right track.

***Median Household Income for 2015 (last year available per U.S. Census) was $56,516 compared to 2007’s median $57,423; 1.6% lower than 2007.  Not impressive given steady, understated inflation at our grocery stores and shopping centers.
***The 2016 labor participation rate per Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) was 63%.  This means 37% of working age  Americans are not working.
***The 2016 U-6 unemployment rate for 2016 per BLS is 9.6%.  If we add the 14% (per BLS) still looking for work after 15 to 26 weeks, we get an unemployment rate of 23.6%.  For millennials, Hispanics, African-Americans and women, it’s nearly double that.  The official U-3 rate of 4.9% is D.C.B.S.
***U.S. home ownership is at the lowest level since 1967.  A few more percentage points and U.S. home ownership sinks to an all-time low since U.S. Census record keeping began in 1965.
***United States GDP for 2016 was a meager 1.6%.  If we subtract out the portion of government spending included, GDP is somewhere in the range of -5%.  (This is my rough estimate – I didn’t spend a lot of time on the math, but the ball park is definitely negative.)

In light of the above, consider the 2016 Office of Inspector General of the United States Department of Defense Report exposing $6.5 trillion dollars unaccounted for in 2015; an interesting statistic given the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) total 2015 Federal expenditures were $3.7 trillion against $3.2 trillion in revenues.  I don’t know if this $6.5 trillion is in addition to the 2001 Inspector General Report showing $2.3 trillion unaccounted for in that year’s DOD budget or if $2.3 trillion grew to $6.5 trillion?  In any case, it’s not an undisclosed fact that DOD receives and spends more money OFF-BOOK than it does ON-BOOK.  The question we as citizens might ask, because  our Elected Congressional Members responsible for budget oversight won’t, is; “where does this DOD off-book money come from and where does it go”?  Similarly, how large are other Federal Agency unaccounted for dollar amounts?  Ms. Catherine Austin Fitts of the Solari Report estimates black budget totals to now be more than $40 trillion.

Also in light of the above statistics, consider that the 2011 partial Federal Reserve Audit by the Government Accounting Office (GAO) disclosed more than $16 trillion allocated to banks and corporations, much of that dispensed internationally by the FED.  Specifics regarding these allocations remain thin.  Are American citizens legally responsible for this money?  If so, do we deserve a proper Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) analysis?  It’s my understanding that the Fed has its own accounting standards and is not held to GAAP standards.  I’m not certain of this and perhaps it’s appropriate for central banks, but if correct, isn’t it curious?

As we get into 2017 the global economy is drowning in on-book sovereign debt as is the United States.  Main Street citizens paying the bills are not permitted access to vast off-book (unaccounted for) spending and debt numbers, but we understand from Inspector General Reports on various agencies that the amounts are enormous and completely non-transparent.  Budget accountability does not exist in Washington D.C.  Obviously, raising interest rates on this debt mountain is willful economic suicide, yet historic economic cycles suggest our economy will reset to some standard of real value at some point in time, whether convenient or not.  After nearly ten years of quantitative easing do we even remember what real value is?  The current financial bubbles across multiple markets cannot be sustained.  Market corrections are usually crash and burn scenarios, but some economists suggest that handled properly, there still remains a small probability that Donald Trump, a very smart man, may be able to orchestrate a smooth transition from extreme over-spending and non-productivity to an economy at least marginally better for Main Street.  I don’t believe a smooth transition to be possible anymore, BUT…

…We should, as responsible citizens, ask ourselves anyway – WHAT DOES HAPPEN TO US ON MAIN STREET IF PRESIDENT TRUMP’S ADMINISTRATION FAILS TO FIX HIS INHERITED 70-YEAR MESS?  We should ask so we can understand and prepare our families, friends and neighborhoods either way – as either way, success or failure, we the people of Main Street will live with, and pay for the resulting circumstance.  The FED has been bolstering the stock market and other markets sans meaningful oversight by Congress.  The Elite are and have been financially positioning themselves with hoards of gold, silver, other precious metals and non-digital, real assets.  Understand that if the banking system collapses, and it looks like it will; most if not all digital assets held by Main Street citizens will likely vanish.  The Oligarchs, inside traders like Rockefeller, Soros, Buffet and other pawns of privilege will be just fine in the coming decade.  By virtue of election, Trump is framed to take the blame, while those who orchestrated certain economic tragedy since WW II will skate free to do it again.  Will we be OK?  Will our children?  Take a minute and give this some thought.

We know the Federal Reserve’s interest is keeping the banking system and its controlling ownership liquid.  Talk of Main Street stimulus is nonsense outside minimal trickle-down.  Trump wants to spend $1 trillion or so on infrastructure.  As a retired civil engineer, I assure you $1 trillion toward infrastructure is a good and necessary idea, but serious needed infrastructure work falls more in the realm of $5 trillion.  Is something better than nothing?  Trump wants to reduce bloated, corrupt Federal spending and money laundering, but faces an enormous array of employee’s, vendors, contractors and special interests completely vested in the continued tumefaction of largely unsupervised Federal spending and off-book money laundering.  Our future depends on deciding now, if we are for or against President Trump’s success because regardless our own ideological preferences; his success is our success as his failure will be ours to own and pass on to our children.

Many of us know with certainty and the remainder, should Trump fail, may soon learn American government and its Elite handlers work hard for Oligarchs and themselves; no one else.  We on Main Street are pandered to, used, alone, without representation, without meaningful fiscal transparency, basically at the mercy of those to whom we gave the reins of self-governance since the 19th Century.  Is it in our best interest to defend Trump, whom we’re not sure about;  or should we jump on the fear, hatred and corruption Establishment Train we already know doesn’t give a hoot about Main Street useless eaters, other than to control us and harvest the wealth we create?

For a short while anyway – I’ll ride with Trump and pray he’s real; because support him or not; if Donald Trump fails, if the Establishment wins, Main Street America and the world will reap those storm clouds, now rising black, bold and threatening on our Main Street horizon.

Lying by the numbers!!!  When politicians we elect, and pay a great deal of money to for representing the world’s transnational monopolies in D.C.,  instead of we the people, lie to us about how great our economy is; we should at least have some idea how clever the lies are – because for one thing, there’s a lot of ’em.  For another, if you’re not prepared you could get robbed.  If you’re in the House or Senate your insider trading rights are worth a fortune.  We the people at least in our own minds, deserve a good honest lie from you, put together with reasonable care, little disclosure and some attitude.  After all, we the people are paying for it… and paying dearly.  At least provide us a good show.  P.T. Barnum always provided a good show and your D.C. circus tradition should stand tall and proud on the midway.

OFFICIAL UNEMPLOYMENT STATISTICS?
The U-3.  Good statistic or crappy lie?

The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) tracks six different metrics for unemployment.  When looking at unemployment reports the viewer should be aware of the metric or metrics being included for reporting purposes as these so-called official reports are regularly employed (pun intended) for propaganda purposes rather than information dissemination or put another way; obfuscation, not clarification.

The six BLS unemployment metrics are:

 (See https://www.bls.gov/lau/stalt.htm for 2016 Annual Averages.)

*****
U-1 Persons unemployed 15 weeks or longer, as a percent of the civilian labor force.  2016 U-1: 2.0%

U-2 Job losers and persons who completed temporary jobs, as a percent of the civilian labor force.  2016 U-2:  2.3%

U-3 Total unemployed, as a percent of the civilian labor force (official unemployment rate).  2016 U-3:  4.9%

U-4 Total unemployed plus discouraged workers, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus discouraged workers.  2016 U-4:  5.2%

U-5 Total unemployed, plus discouraged workers, plus all other persons marginally attached to the labor force, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force.  2016 U-5:  5.9%

U-6 Total unemployed, plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force, plus total employed part time for economic reasons, as a percent of the civilian labor force plus all persons marginally attached to the labor force.  2016 U-6:  9.6%
*****

The vigilant receiver of .gov unemployment statistics will carefully consider the specified parameters (identified on the BLS website) of what is or isn’t included within each of the U-1 through U-6 metrics – particularly the popular U-3.

U-3 is the officially published unemployment percentage regularly given out by the Federal government and echoed across our largely uninformed nation by CIA compromised, fake news bureaus.  U-3 is a real number, but hardly reflects unemployment levels across Main Street America.

To grasp actual Main Street unemployment levels, economist John Williams, of ShadowStats Alternative Unemployment Rate (See http://www.shadowstats.com/) fame suggests the BLS’ highest metric, the U-6 category is still not an accurate indicator of real life unemployment conditions.  U-6 doesn’t consider those individuals unemployed, who have given up looking for work after more than 12 months of searching.  Mr. Williams says to obtain a realistic estimate of Main Street unemployment, add the BLS U-6 figure  (obtain from https://www.bls.gov/lau/stalt.htm) to the long term unemployed (more than one year, (see https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t12.htm) who quit looking for work, but still list themselves as unemployed.

If we take the BLS 2016 Average Annual U-6 rate of 9.6% and add to it the BLS February 2017 percentage of unemployed for 15 weeks to 26 weeks, that is, 14%; we obtain a more realistic Main Street unemployment rate for February 2017 of 23.6%.  This seems about what we see in my Arizona neighborhood.  I hope yours is better.  Note that in the interest of conservatism, I only went so far as 15 to 26 weeks at 14% per BLS.  The over 27 week stat is 23.8%, which corresponds more closely with the 63% labor participation rate published by BLS.

The above 1600 Watch, 23.6% unemployment estimate corresponds fairly well to the February 2017 BLS labor participation rate of 63%, which indicates 37% of American workers are not working.  When more than 90 million working age Americans are not working and the U.S. population is roughly 313 million (not all workers, of course), the unemployment rate is not below 5%.  This official government figure, the current U-3 of 4.9% is pure political obfuscation.

Another doozy is the calculated OFFICIAL RATE OF INFLATION.

OFFICIAL RATE OF INFLATION STATISTICS?
Valid information or just another crappy lie?

A cynical person might suggest our government intentionally MIS-calculates inflation rates as low as possible to avoid adding COST OF LIVING ADJUSTMENTS to beneficiaries of programs like Social Security.  How do they do this we may inquire?

Rate of inflation, say over the past year is a simple calculation.  Take last year’s Consumer Price Index (CPI), call it P1; subtract it from this year’s CPI, call it P2; divide the difference by P1 as the basis; and multiply by 100 to obtain a percentage.  It looks like this: ((P2 – P1)/P1) x 100 = Rate of Inflation for the past year.

Example, where: P1 = 104; P2 = 106:  ((106-104)/104) x 100 = 1.92% inflation for the year

Obviously, if we vary the inputs used in each time period, rather than holding them constant as they were originally; the calculated inflation rate for the period in question can easily and predictably be manipulated up or down.  Let politics be the judge.

The CPI is a bit more complicated and that’s where the inflation rate magick happens.  Statistical data are easily altered by varying inputs.  If not careful; garbage in; garbage out as they say.  If interested in an educated tome on this subject of CPI, I suggest perusing the following paper:  http://file.scirp.org/pdf/ME20100200005_38971786.pdf.  Take a look and you’ll quickly  grasp why I’ve not included equations for CPI calc’s.

For the rest of us civilians, let’s just understand that by including or not including certain items or by changing entirely those items included or not included, we can conveniently manipulate the data.  For instance:  using an example recently provided by Mr. Paul Craig Roberts (See http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/), let’s imagine the price variation for an expensive cut of steak to be included in the CPI calculation.  Let’s imagine that price has risen significantly over the past year.  Therefore, including this price change in the data set will contribute to an increase in the calculated CPI.  Ouch!  We don’t want that.  It sounds bad if you’re a politician.  So, let’s revise the way CPI is calculated.  Let’s lie to we the people.  Isn’t that what we politicos and bureaucrats are paid to do by the big important monopolies anyway?  Absolutely, and the voting booth proves it.

Just dump that expensive cut of meat from the index and substitute a less expensive cut having a much less significant price increase – or better, no increase.  Voila!  Problem solved.  Now we’ve taken a time honored, economic benchmark and reduced it to meaningless nonsense.  If I’m not mistaken, this is exactly what BLS has done using what many refer to as Greenspan’s “substitution theory”, now added to by the “Chained CPI” concept – none of which I really care to understand, other than to know we’re being lied to on Main Street.

Magickly, our economy looks great no matter how loud that flushing noise is getting; and we the corrupt thugs can be re-elected by we the people and keep on keepin’ on shillin’ for the world’s greediest transnational monopolies and our lucrative inside trading deals.  Ain’t it great?

Just sayin’.  Citizen beware if you dare!

Climate change is real, but what drives it?  How should it be studied?  Can a tax fix it?

Global temperature measurement, while being perfected, has so far been analogous to measuring orange diameters estimated by measuring apples; claiming estimates must be adjusted for accuracy by measuring lemon diameters estimated by measuring apricots, then interpolated to apples; then fine tuning the whole thing by comparing lime diameters estimated by measuring oranges and finally projecting the illogical results back to orange diameters.  This sort of nonsense constitutes profound scientific consensus per con-artists the likes of Al Gore and becomes the basis for transferring $trillions to Elite dynastic families and their dutiful pawns from hard working people around the world.

If I’m not a climate denier and don’t scoff at climate science, why would I make the facetious statement above?  Two reasons.  First, the word consensus has no place in science.  If science is systematized knowledge with various departments, say climate science; and if study is the application of mental faculties to the acquisition of knowledge; then we come full circle.  Science is study.  Consensus implies no further study required, arrogantly suggesting we know everything. No science needed.  This is ignorance and denial, not science.

Secondly, explain scientific truth as best we know it.  Admit what we don’t know or are uncertain of.  Hypothesize our theories, but treat theories as theory, not fact.  Discuss theory honestly.  To do otherwise is dishonest at best and worse, becomes manipulative politicization of science toward whatever outside agenda is pursued… usually money, power or both.

If you’re a millennial looking forward to paying your Carbon Tax, you may at least ponder the following.  Weather stations were originally created to monitor local daily weather.  They were not designed to reliably measure global climate variation over time and must be re-vamped to do so.  Collection of temperature data is particularly difficult to standardize and though progress is being made, old data, pre-1940’s data and today’s data don’t go together and as such, ought be treated accordingly, not forced into contrived, possibly erroneous compatibility.  This is unnecessary and counter-productive.  Popular climate preachers are typically disingenuous regarding these concerns.

Water holds more heat than land, therefore is a significant area of concern.  On-water measurement variables include, but are not limited to:  Was water temperature checked at the water surface?  How far above the surface?  How quickly?  At what time of day?  Did time of day vary?  In what type of container – metal, wood, plastic, fabric?  Below the water surface?  How deep?  Were a ship’s water intake tubes used for sampling?  How large a ship?  How deep are its intake tubes?  How close to the engine heat were the samples taken?  Oceans never stop moving.  What effect do currents have on sampling?  Are sampling locations constant – variable – by how much?

On-land measurement variables include, but are not limited to:  Time of day sampling consistency.  Has the time of day for sampling varied?  Has the weather sampling station been relocated – how far – did conditions change?  Was it near the top of a hill and now is at the bottom?  Was it in the shade and is now in the sun?  Was it not protected and now is contained within a building?  Is the measuring device located near a building exhaust fan?  Are the measuring devices different today than equipment used in the past?  Was the equipment located in a rural area that is now urban?  Are the measuring devices properly and regularly calibrated?  Are the sampling employees qualified – by whom – how?  The list of variables is endless – but not at all insurmountable if handled with rigorous discipline.

Global warming enthusiasts insist that raw temperature data cannot be trusted or used due to above recognized issues and dozens more to boot.  I don’t disagree this is an issue.  To suggest consistency or uniformity exists in temperature measurement across many different countries and cultures over long periods of time is ridiculous.  GW enthusiasts insist this data must be adjusted, cleaned and homogenized.  I don’t necessarily disagree.  However, professional judgement based on experience and education are intrinsic to selecting and implementing these adjustments.  There are no internationally accepted standards established, though progress is being made.  This lack of standardization renders homogenization protocols used by different agencies across the globe – non-uniform at best; arbitrary at worse.  It’s not possible to have obvious recognizable variations in protocol and equipment and still claim consensus across the data streams.  This is dishonest.  Why don’t we just admit what the difficulties are and get on with honest debate?  That would be credible… at least more credible.

I don’t have a bone to pick with climatology.  I do have a bone to pick with so-called scientists who claim to know more than they know; or who politicize findings via clever data adjustments; particularly when motivated by continued need for financing and paying the mortgage.  Humans don’t tend to bite the hand that feeds them and scientists are no exception.  In fact, they may be the classic case.

No scientist claiming consensus is an honest scientist.  There’s always more to discover and no one understands this better than real scientists.  Lorentz uncovered the backbone of Einstein’s Relativity Theories with his equations for transforming time, distance and mass in terms of velocity. Einstein then carried the ball into the relativity end zone – so now we have consensus.  Right?  Wrong.  Now we’re digging into quantum theory and relativity isn’t necessarily contradicted, but is certainly tipped upside down as physics fails completely to explain the absolute nature of reality and stubbornly resists reaching out to the metaphysical abyss for possible answers – the Grand Unified Theory or whatever.  We don’t know what we don’t know.  We need our scientists to be honest and should demand no less.

Studies reveal significant factors plausibly impacting earth’s climate patterns beyond anthropomorphic (human) activity, some of which appear cyclical.  Two come immediately to mind.  Sun-spot activity for example.

Dr. Matthew J. Penn (National Solar Observatory, Tucson, AZ.) offered this startling consideration regarding sun-spot cycles.  (Taken from Monica Young’s July 24, 2013 Sky & Telescope article:  http://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-news/the-weakest-solar-cycle-in-100-years/

*************

Penn offered another, more catastrophic option: the sunspot cycle might die altogether. His team uses sunspot spectra to measure their magnetic fields, and his data show a clear trend: the magnetic field strength in sunspots is waning.

Penn’s research shows that sunspots’ magnetic field strength is declining over time. Sunspots can only form if the magnetic field is greater than around 1,500 Gauss, so if the trend continues, we could be headed for a time where no spots appear on the Sun’s surface.

  1. Penn

“If this trend continues, there will be almost no spots in Cycle 25, and we might be going into another Maunder Minimum,” Penn states. The first Maunder Minimum occurred during the second half of the 17th century. Almost no spots were seen on the Sun during this time, which coincided with Europe’s Little Ice Age.
*****
Dr. Penn is not alone wondering if a new ice age is more probable than global warming.  There is no real consensus.

*****

Milankovitch Cycles are another example.  Milankovic and others have studied and described their findings relative to collective effects of variation in earth’s rotational and orbital movements on climate over many thousands of years.  Back in the Roaring 20’s, Serbian geophysicist and astronomer, Milutin Milankovic discovered variations in orbital eccentricity, axial tilt and precession resulted in cyclical variation in solar radiation reaching the earth.  This variation (orbital forcing) strongly influences climatic patterns on earth.  This has been confirmed by analysis of deep-ocean cores by others (Hays, Imbrie & Shackleton), though many questions remain unanswered.  Axial tilt variation appears to be significant, whereas elliptical orbit variation has only minor effects.

*****

How can climate scientists develop so-called models leaving out sun-spot activity, cyclical variation of earth’s axis of rotation and elliptical orbit and still suggest their childish models establish climate consensus based primarily on anthropomorphic activity?  This is a bad joke; is unprofessional; dishonest; and undermines climate study credibility.

Dishonesty in climatology disgraces the sincere scientists among us and raises legitimate questions:  To whose benefit?  Where is the money going?  I’m a 65-year old retiree.  None of this impacts my generation much.  As a millennial, however, you may want to ask a question or two before jumping on the Carbon Tax bus.  When someone demands your money; Ask who?  Ask why? Ask to what purpose?

  1. In what manner does any tax reduce CO2 emissions? {I see money changing hands, but no effect on carbon cycles what-so-ever.}
  2. Since Carbon Tax credits are created out of thin air, like fiat currency; who gets to create these credits from nothing and sell them for $trillions of dollars once corrupt government pawns have mandated them by law?  Al Gore and friends?  Why them?  Why not you?

For what it’s worth, the Rothschild/Rockefeller and friends central banking fraud is finally coming to an insolvent end.  We might ask, how do inbred idiots authorized to print money from thin air go broke?  Amazing level of greed and stupidity here, but I digress.

  1. Is it possible that these dynastic families; these corrupt, conscienceless, sometimes pedophilic Oligarchs see the end of their criminal banking enterprise and view the Carbon Tax as their new bonanza? Their new free ride on the backs of the gullible?

In my view, central banking has proved to be the largest criminal enterprise in economic history.  The Carbon Tax will dwarf it in terms of sheer volume of wealth transfer from workers of the world to the Oligarchs through compliant, psychopathic government thugs.

The Carbon Tax is about wealth transfer and Oligarch control.  It has nothing to do with environment or climate.  If we wish to be environmentalists and many of us do; we should do so intelligently and effectively.  Listening to con-men like Al Gore and friends is neither.  Let’s at least demand honesty in our universities, scientists and leaders.  It’s not too much to ask.

I don’t pretend to know if Donald Trump is what he says.  Time and his actions will tell.  Hopefully, a bit more than the single month to date.  This much we do know.  The war mongering, Neo-Con Establishment; say treasonous Republicans like McCain and cannibalistic Democrats like Clinton along with the Oligarch controlled media, all of Congress and most of our courts are unanimously going full-tilt, group-think bat-shit to destroy Trump.  Unfortunately, they carry significant portions of heavily entrained Main Street on their drooling bus-ride to hell and world-wide violence.  Given that transnational monopolies controlled by very few dynastic families took over the U.S. economic system in 1913 and garnered full political control with the highly successful 1963 coup; now freely running our conscienceless Fascist system, a mockery of Constitutional self governance; we ought be paying attention and thinking for ourselves, not parroting the seeds of our own destruction like lemmings looking for a cliff.

I watched the Trump Press Conference on Thursday (02-16-2017), was struck by and disappointed by four things.

The first thing was (and is) President Trump’s apparently sincere desire to work with countries around the world in peaceful, mutually beneficial – or to use his word, “FAIR” partnership – even with countries the BANKING/WAR/OIL BUSINESS MOGULS prefer us hate…and profitably kill.  How many times did President Trump reiterate in various ways over the course of more than an hours’ unscripted Q & A; WAR IS NOT THE ANSWER?  He claims to desire PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH.  Human history demonstrates no other path to peace – at least none uncovered in anthropological records, so his stance seems reasonable from a leadership standpoint, though uncomfortably and perhaps necessarily close to aiding the military industrial complex.  What would you do, if you were he?  In his position?  Under oath to protect and defend?

The slavering media drones clamoring for and mindlessly inferring, if not insolently demanding Trump take us to war with Russia was astonishing.  WTF???  How stupid is media stupid?  How stupid can journalism stupid be?  What’s wrong with these people…and more importantly, what’s wrong with the conditioned folks on Main Street soaking this mindless hatred up like thirsty sponges lost in an intelligence desert?  I get that American education is failing miserably, but do we have to brag on it to the world?

The second thing was (and is) the compulsive grasping by journalism school sycophants for smoke and mirrors, non-reality and the screeching insistence that an obvious psyop is real.  WTF again???  There still  isn’t and never has been one shred of evidence provided by anyone that Russian people hacked the morons at DNC and the war mongering Hillary camp.  Thankfully, the HACKERS, through WickiLeaks primarily, exposed to Main Street that the Clintons are guilty of treason as are most of Congress, not to mention extensive involvement of the Privileged Powerful in morally depraved pedophilia; not to mention, unsavory implications of illegal child vaccine testing and organ harvesting in UN protected seclusion as is going on in central Haiti.  It is now revealed, to those paying attention, that our CIA at Oligarch behest, misusing American wealth, diplomatic influence and military power are de-stabilizing defenseless countries like Somalia, Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Ukraine, Libya, Syria and Haiti to name a few – where thousands of orphans are brutally created (we call it liberated), kidnapped (we call it rescued), used for illegal drug testing (we call it UN peace-keeping aid) and finally organ harvested ( we don’t even recognize this one) before hiding evidence (we call it burial)…and that’s for the less attractive kids.  The pretty ones are taken for sale as pedophilic sex slaves in well traveled circles of the rich and famous in horror shows like Washington D.C.  BUT THE MEDIA AND MAIN STREET DON’T WANT TO HEAR ABOUT OR DISCUSS ANY OF THIS – DO THEY -DO WE?

The third thing is simply insistence by apparently ignorant media drones that their Oligarch motivated lies are somehow justified or necessary.  WTF??? Agendas are agendas and everyone has theirs.  We used to have a right to our own creative agendas here in America, including the editorial press, but today the Press Corpse throws tantrums insisting this is not acceptable.  It’s the Oligarch IDEOLOGY FOR THE LITTLE PEOPLE OR THE HIGHWAY.  Chant, chant, chant!  Screech, screech screech!  As Hitler said, “Make the lie big and tell it often”.  As Bertrand Russel taught (and I’m paraphrasing); dumb down the useless eaters (Main Street) and if that doesn’t work, drug ’em until they believe snow is black, not white and they’re content to live as impoverished feudal serfs serving their bettersIn what way do media lies serve the best interest of anyone?  The negligent press wreak destruction upon their own children with this pathetic nonsense.  Lies serve ignorance, nothing more.

The fourth thing is the schizophrenic anti-war – or is it hypocritical Left and corrupt Right wailing like hyenas?  WTF???  These conditioned morons, “useful idiots” as Lenin referred to academics and press, ignored Clinton Administration war crimes in Somalia and Yugoslavia.  Then openly and rightly hated Bush I for misusing American might to commit war crimes and aid Oligarch Resource Rape.  Then completely ignore Obama’s war crimes, sinking far below anything Bush I could ignorantly dream of by murdering thousands of innocent civilians with drones… and now, it appears they actually have in President Donald Trump, an ANTI-WAR / PRO-PEACE / PRO-DIPLOMATIC LEADER sitting in the Oval Office and they can’t stop berating him for trying to work peacefully with other nations during the lousy four weeks he’s been in office.  This is either STUPIDITY, HYPOCRISY  or I guess both at sub-human levels of disgrace rendering it embarrassing to be human.

I don’t know if Trump is real.  I don’t go to the meetings – BUT FOR OUR OWN SAKE ON MAIN STREET AND ACROSS THE WORLD – Trump deserves a chance to show who he is.  We on Main Street deserve the same opportunity.

Like the late John Lennon so eloquently and melodically sang back in ’69 with his Plastic Ono Band“GIVE PEACE A CHANCE“.  If not, destruction is always waiting in the Neo-Con wings.  Destruction is forever if we keep on choosing it.  The Oligarchs insure we get what we ask for.

Jon Rappoport's Blog

CDC “Spider” Scientists attack the CDC, blow the lid off

They write a letter to the CDC chief of staff

And I write a letter to them

by Jon Rappoport

January 15, 2017

There is a group of anonymous scientists at the US Centers for Disease Control—they call themselves the Spider Group—Scientists Preserving Integrity, Diligence and Ethics in Research. They have penned a letter to the CDC’s chief of staff, Carmen S. Villar:

Here is the explosive accusation they make:

“We are a group of scientists at CDC that are very concerned about the current state of ethics at our agency. It appears that our mission is being influenced and shaped by outside parties and rogue interests. It seems that our mission and Congressional intent for our agency is being circumvented by some of our leaders. What concerns us most, is that it is becoming the norm and not…

View original post 1,882 more words

2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION CHOICES:
{What does your vote mean?}

First a couple of short term factoids:
Social Security goes into the red fiscal year 2017.
Medicaid goes into the red fiscal year 2017.
14.5 million more people have stopped looking for work in 2016 than in 2009.
94.7 million people out of 313 million U.S. population are out of work.  (That’s 30% unemployment, not 4.9%.)  Per U.S. Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics, the U.S. labor participation rate for October, 2016 is 62.6%, a new 38-year low.
U.S. home ownership at a 50-year low per U.S. Census Bureau.
National Debt, January 20, 2009:  $10.9 trillion.
National Debt, November 4, 2016:  $19.8 trillion.
2017 Federal Budget is $4.15 trillion.
More than $50 trillion unaccounted for in published Federal Accounting Records and Inspector General audits since 2001.
Congressional oversight = non-existent.  Honor, integrity and courage = N/A in D.C.

*************

DT: Not likely your grandchildren will ever be micro-chipped.  They’ll retain the possibility of living untracked and free to pursue their own vision.
HC:  Your grandchildren will be micro-chipped by government mandate, will have every aspect of their lives tracked and will experience zero possibility of freedom as we’ve known it.  Your grandchildren will inhabit a free roaming prison as feudal serfs as Jefferson predicted – if we’re not vigilant.

DT:  Not likely your grandchildren will be forcibly vaccinated, which means they may escape government induced autism.
HC:  Hillary and friends love government mandated vaccinations, which means a high probability of autism for your grandchildren.  In other words – parents will pay for the privilege of disabling their own children.

DT:  Globalist Agenda 21’s Common Core will be dumped, which means your grandchildren will not be raised with the mentality of cattle.  Imagination, dreams and creative potential will still be encouraged and hope for a better future can thrive.
HC:  Common Core will be expanded, assuring your grandchildren have the mentality of barn animals,  zero deductive reasoning capability, will only know what to think, not how to think and will be content to serve their government with no hope for any kind of better future or abundance.

DT:  Repatriation of offshore monies, lowering the highest corporate tax rate in the world, reducing corrupt, discriminatory regulation, implementing debt/equity swaps, etc. mean the possibility of economic growth, productive jobs, wealth creation and the ability to sustain Social Security and Medicaid.
HC:  Social Security and Medicaid both go red in fiscal 2017.  Hillary’s only economic ideas are war, impoverishing taxation and suffocating regulation.

DT:  Inner cities have the possibility of improved economic opportunity, educational facilities and reduced black genocide numbers.
HC:  28% of all black babies will continue to be aborted ( 4 times the rate of white abortions).  Improvements to economic conditions and education will remain non-existent as under current Democrat leadership.  Uneducated, low skilled poverty and government dependence are the well springs of Democrat voting majorities and will continue expansion to Hispanic populations.

DT:  Our 2nd Amendment rights are safe.
HC:  Our 2nd Amendment will die along with our 1st Amendment as fast as Hillary and friends can kill them.

DT: Trump promises to fight ISIS, hopefully in part by removing our troops from Middle East countries where they are being misused as a private police force for BIG BANKING/BIG OIL at tax payer expense.
HC:  Hillary’s State Department we now know funded and armed ISIS in Syria and Iraq through excess arms shipments to Libya and shipped by the Muslim Brotherhood to Syria.  This is the deal gone bad that got four good Americans murdered in Benghazi while Hillary and Obama watched TV.  Why would Hillary fight as she promises against a terrorist group she herself, along with CIA helped build?

DT:  GATT, NAFTA and other U.S. impoverishing trade treaties will be renegotiated and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) will never happen.
HC:  Hillary supports and her husband signed NAFTA into law.  Passage of TPP is a given, which transfers American sovereignty and Rule of Law to corrupt transnational corporate monopolies.

DT:  Trump is a negotiator, not a brawler.  He wins by being smart and making money; not by fighting and transferring money to Elite bankers.
HC:  Hillary is an Establishment Democrat Neo-Con, owned by corrupt bankers, who guarantees war, war and more war.

DT:  Trump earns a living on Main Street America providing products (real estate) and services (resort casinos, golf,).  Let’s see what he can do with D.C.  He is a creative individual who provides opportunity to the communities he works in and pays his own bills.
HC:  Earns a living in D.C. selling U.S. government access, favors and secrets – all under the table and at tax payer expense.  She creates or provides nothing else of value.  Hillary is a dangerous parasite.

There’s dozens more comparisons, but basically as Catherine Austin Fitts (Solari Report) recently stated in her two part Dark Journalist interview and I’m paraphrasing; this election is about economics and other important things, but it really comes down to a long term choice for human or non-human. Will we support our own humanity or go with Hillary and friends with their trans-humanist, cyborg, neo-feudal agenda?  It’s a pretty serious choice we’re making here for our grandchildren and future generations.  Let’s at least think about it.

I don’t know much about Trump, but maybe he deserves a chance?

I do know Hillary and for thirty years, she’s proven herself to be pathological; a liar and a greedy, treasonous parasite.

If Trump overcomes voter fraud sufficiently and is elected November 8th, he will require citizen support if he is to take on the Plutocracy corruption and their BANKING/OIL/WAR BUSINESS MODEL.  The Elite will undoubtedly threaten the Trump family, friends, acquaintances, business associates, etc. and if they have to, will likely attempt to force Trump  down the Lincoln – JFK road.

We’ll either help wage the battle against Elite Oligarchy totalitarianism with Trump; or shuffle off to our barnyard pens under Pawn Hillary’s corrupt, pathological Rule.

Good luck with how November 8, 2016 turns out as it appears to be a turning point for our grandchildren.

Collectivist Anarchists such as Mikhail Bakunin (Statism and Anarchy, 1873), along with Communists Karl Marx, Frederich Engels  (Communist Manifesto-1848; Capital, Volume 1-1867, Volume 2-1885, Volume 3-1894) and others were justly disturbed by the cruel, sometimes vicious exploitation of working people they believed to be the direct, inevitable result of capitalism at the hands of the bourgeoisie.  Without getting into  complex socioeconomic theories debated among pioneers of Socialism, Anarchism, Syndicalism, etc., let’s agree that generally speaking, the prevailing discourse at the time (19th Century) was wage earner (proletariat) versus wage provider (capitalist/bourgeoisie) and the ensuing class struggle.

Marx didn’t so much promote Communism as predict it.  Some of Marx’s predictions came to pass, but much of his perceived future came down through history very differently.  For example;  Marx correctly foresaw the inevitable rise of monopoly capitalism, but the destruction of small business and wage earner wealth did not wholly diminish as he thought it would.  While corrupt monopolies did flourish, small and medium businesses also flourished and worker earnings grew significantly.  It turns out, all boats tend to rise under free market capitalism in spite of corruption and unfair advantage.  The revolution never materialized, but the despicable evolution is alive and well, though of a very different nature than Marx thought.

Marx and others opined that the proletariat would violently revolt or as Bernstein, Gramsci and others opined, non-violently evolve with the workers taking control of the State; destroying private property ownership; ending inequality; finally ending the need for a State entirely; the result being a prosperous paradise.  Marx and Engels realized that the State as an intermediate step would for some period of time have to be frighteningly powerful, but then would magically go away as it realized it was no longer necessary.  What Karl Marx envisioned happening, up to the powerful State part, in my humble opinion, did in fact happen, is happening – just not at all the way he imagined.

It never occurred to Marx that the bourgeoisie, or as I call them today, the Elite, the world’s dynastic families, the Oligarchy, the Plutocracy – would identify Communism or more generally Collectivism as the ideal mechanism for obtaining total monopoly control of all governments, resources, people and wealth on earth.  Marx never saw that coming.  His students and academic adherents still don’t see it; but the Elite see it and use it perfectly to their greedy advantage.  Marx’s important work provided the Elite, the world’s largest, most corrupt transnational monopoly owners a road map, a business plan by which they could hope to rule the world.  And as we can all see, they are trying their inbred best to make that happen.

Main Street citizens, for the most part are busy raising families, earning a living, recreating and so forth.  They don’t pay much attention to political ideology nor its impact on legislation, regulation, taxation or their lives.  The inbred Elite on the other hand, may have more money than brains or honor, but they do pay attention.  The Elite realized in about a minute that Marx’s vision could be a wonderful thing for them – if they could manage history as a self-fulfilling prophesy with themselves as controllers of the State rather than workers.  Nothing makes control of populations easier than top-down, centrally controlled government.

The Bolshevik Revolution, Mao’s Revolution and the spread of international communism, now more digestibly called socialism have been and still are entirely funded by the world’s wealthiest Elite; are supported by the Elite through their Foundations, Institutes, think tanks, study groups, associations and of course, as Lenin so aptly exclaimed, the useful idiots of academia.  Good intentions are oft used against us.

MONOPOLY CANNOT SURVIVE FREE MARKET CAPITALISM.  Monopoly requires assistance and protection, usually provided through the wheel chair of corrupt government regulation and taxation, in order to destroy potential competition and provide free reign for price fixing, government policy manipulation, etc.  Marx inadvertently handed the keys for world domination off to the same Elite he so despised;  then we the people gave them the car…the train….the boat….the plane…and everything else to go with all that – and we don’t even realize it.  We think we’re fighting it.

The so-called New World Order (NWO) isn’t a conspiracy.  It’s an effective BANKING/OIL/WAR BUSINESS PLAN operating in plain sight every day of every week.  A plan whose evil strength lies in its ability to go unnoticed; to masquerade as something it’s not, while cloaking it’s impoverishing, enslaving nature in a media cloak of propaganda, entrainment and conditioning.

Capitalism allows for monopoly, but discourages it.  Collectivism not only allows monopoly; but protects and nourishes it.  It’s time as voters we recognize we’re being had.  R’s and D’s are all wholly owned subsidiaries of the Elite Oligarchy.   Main Street has zero representation in D.C.  Transnational monopolies have 500% of the ears in D.C.  That means our elected and appointed officials are usually bribed more than once, hence more than 100% corruption.

I’m not sure how we’re going to fix this, but I do know we Main Street folk better start discussing it and we best exercise a bit of individual, free thinking before casting our 2106 votes in November.  As the late, Aaron Russo said and I’m paraphrasing; Quit being good R’s and D’s.  Start being good Americans.  We owe this to ourselves and the generations to come.  Let’s take back self-governance together as the good, decent people we are.

Hillary Clinton dutifully serves the world’s Elite dynastic families and of course, her bank accounts.  Until and unless she outlives her Plutocratic usefulness, she stands protected, far above the U.S. Rule of Law.  None-the-less, you may wonder why the FBI and Director Comey pretended to investigate Hillary Rodham Clinton for alleged violations of what we refer to as  The Espionage Act?  Judge for yourself from original sources.  Here’s a copy of the pertinent code sections for your own perusal.  It isn’t complicated.
A quick read of the code subsections f and g below show this is not just about Hillary.  Every person who knew about Hillary’s illegal private email system (as Secretary of State) is, under subsection g, also potentially guilty; subject to fines and imprisonment.  We’re talking a cast of hundreds here, including Barack Hussein Obama, as can be seen within the publically disclosed emails themselves.  Hundreds – With an H!!!  Very big deal here!  Makes Watergate look like a kindergarten prank.
U.S. Code, Title 18, Chapter 37, Section 793, subsections (f) and (g) are copied below as taken from: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793
Please refer to the entire Code Section 793 available at the above Cornell University Law School online library link so you can see the full context.
*************

(f)

Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(g)

If two or more persons conspire to violate any of the foregoing provisions of this section, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy shall be subject to the punishment provided for the offense which is the object of such conspiracy.
*************
Note how clearly and concisely the above code subsections are written.  Much of U.S. Code, as we know, is drafted by D.C. connected third parties to serve whatever agenda a particular group of insiders has paid our legislators to service.  Occasionally a piece of honest code is written to serve we the people, but normally that’s just pandering or an accidental side effect, not by intent on the part of our corrupt legislators in the House and Senate good-old-boy/girl clubs.
It appears this legislation was actually written to seriously dissuade responsible parties from being casual or happenstance regarding matters such as correspondence, plans, drawings, schedules, etc. related to American national defense.  It’s quite clear.  If you do any of these wrong things; you are subject to this, that or both consequences.  There isn’t a word about intent, Acts-of-God, accidental whatever, stupidity, etc. contained in this code.  If you do this; here’s what happens.
But not for Hillary Clinton.  WHY?
If we take away anything of value from the 2016 election cycle, let’s at least begin to realize one inconvenient truth (thanks Big Al); because if we can’t admit this one truth to ourselves, we cannot fix it and our kids cannot be free.
ONE INCONVENIENT TRUTH:
In year 2016, our three branches of United States’ government; Executive (President and Agencies), Legislative (House of Representatives and U.S. Senate) and Judicial (Supreme Court) DO NOT represent or work for we the people.  These three branches of government have degenerated into a money/power laundering center of organized crime serving the exclusive needs of the world’s Elite dynastic families, through their interlocking network of private clubs, international banks, NGO’s and transnational corporate monopolies, TOGETHER OWNING AND OPERATING ALL (yes I said all) OUR ELECTED AND APPOINTED FEDERAL OFFICIALS.  I hope there are exceptions to this systemic D.C. corruption, but I don’t know of any.
Hillary Clinton and her husband have passionately served exclusive needs of these Elite dynastic families at least since William Jefferson Clinton collaborated as a prominent Iran-Contra, CIA Darling via his elected gubernatorial office in Arkansas (’79-’81 & ’83-’92).  Neither Clinton has ever looked back and both have been hungrily feeding at the gullible public trough, whining about dedicated public service for nearly four decades now.  When you live your corrupt life as a degenerate, privileged servant of the Oligarchy, you and your family are protected.
That’s why Hillary hasn’t really been investigated and will never be indicted or tried – in spite of obvious violations of our Espionage Act.  Some of her emails have now been made public.  You can read the code language above for yourself.  If these public emails are in fact hers, you don’t need an attorney to explain she violated subsection (f) and people who knew about it violated subsection (g).  The only possibility of a legal trial for Hillary will be if the Plutocracy decides they’re finished using her.  That circumstance, fortunate for us on Main Street, would place her – and her complicit partners in jeopardy.  Short of such misfortune; forget about it as they say in New Jersey.
Under the Act, it isn’t only Hillary who’s in deep doo doo.  Obama himself and quite a list of prominent others are now known to be complicit and knowledgeable within the context of these now-public emails.  Not all, but many of these emails are directly or indirectly related to matters of national defense and are relevant evidence under the Act.  Heads significant to financially rewarding Plutocracy corruption will have to roll if this matter is actually pursued.
Trust me on this.  HILLARY’S TREASON WILL NEVER BE PROSECUTED.
The good news, however, is we the people are now armed with this new tidbit of knowledge.  If we’re smart, we’ll put this knowledge to good use and cast more knowledgeable votes in November.  The bad news is, if you already voted for Trump through early voting; your vote has already been democratically adjusted and now counts for Hillary, but that’s how the banana republic cookie crumbles – UNTIL AND UNLESS WE DECIDE TO CHANGE IT.  Just kidding.  We all know there’s no stinking voter fraud in Amerika.  Have a great election!