06-27-2010: Drowning in Lies

Posted: June 27, 2010 in Connect The Dots

Keeping up with U.S. Federal government misrepresentation of fact has become an exhausting endeavor for any citizen possessing functional ears eliciting even a low grade auditory response.  It’s been lies, lies and more lies since Communist Woodrow Wilson was packaged and sold to the American people by the international banking oligarchy and immediately saddled us with the Federal Reserve System, the world’s most active and most powerful criminal enterprise.  FDR then quickly made the pathetic Wilson look like a fourth grade communist piker.  More currently, One World Bush I was a disaster.  Clinton was bad.  Bush II was worse.  Obama is a freaking migraine and may soon lead the mindless lemmings to the holocaust of freedom if his treasonous Administration can ignorantly and corruptly keep on task.

Reactionary paranoia?  Well, 1600 Watch suggests not accepting anything 1600 Watch points out – or anyone else for that matter – just look at “what they do”.  What Barack Hussein Obama does seldom matches what he says, although admittedly what he says is difficult to comprehend as it is consistently vague, disjointed and unrelated to the stated purpose of his many teleprompter read speeches – hundreds of them.

Dr. Michael Savage has claimed that “liberalism is a mental disorder”.  If Savage is incorrect, as many say with great hostility, then please explain why the following are  occurring?  One final assumption is that people suffering from a mental disorder will think or act “irrationally” at least some of the time.

As a starting point, please assume the major countries of the world (at least the G20) are led by mature adults, a stretch I know, but be gracious and assume it anyway;  and acknowledging that all of these countries have blindly fallen victim to the specious doctrine of unproductive and historically unworkable socialism, we make note of the following observations.

  • The world’s G20 leaders, including Barack Hussein Obama are meeting in Canada this week, on the heels of this year’s Bilderberg Group meeting, to discuss the problems resulting from their collective slide into intentional bankruptcy.  The allegedly brilliant Obama recommends to this august group, significantly more Keynesian borrowing and irresponsible government spending as the only obvious cure for problems unarguably caused by “too much spending”.  This is like handing a drowning child a cup of water or trying to put out a blazing fire by pouring gasoline on it.  Is this not irrational?
  • Barack Hussein Obama and his Administration promised 4 million new jobs if they were authorized to steal and spend nearly $1 trillion  tax payer dollars. They were not authorized, but did it anyway.  Much of this money is now a permanent rolling slush fund for under the table pay offs to friends of government.  Over the past 18 months we have lost 4 million jobs, which is 8 million jobs short of Obama projections.  The Administration is now pushing for more Keynesian spending and theft of even more taxpayer dollars to supposedly create more jobs.  Is this rational?
  • The Obama Administration talks daily about “green jobs” and the precious environment.  We are approaching 2 1/2 months into the Gulf Oil Leak and the best and brightest of  Obama’s experts have not figured out how to separate oil from water, confine the oil and prevent it from reaching shore.  Really?  Are the environmentalists aware that BP is adding highly toxic dispersants to the gushing oil leak?  These dispersants increase the specific gravity of the leaking oil mixture, causing the oil to form unmanageable plumes beneath the sea’s surface.  This criminal negligence and environmental horror show is not even commented on by Obama’s regulatory agencies.  The freedom toxic Obama Regime solution to what is now melodramatically referred to as the greatest environmental disaster in U.S. history is to discuss damage claims and future green jobs and to appoint a slush fund czar to oversee allocating monies stolen from BP to friends of government;  all with no Congressional oversight, of course.  Is this rational behavior on the part of a man who is, or at least was, the most powerful person in the world?
  • Senator Dianne Feinstein remarked just this morning on Fox News Sunday, that the Afghanistan Taliban is part terrorist group and part narco-cartel.  Are you folks aware that according to Asian Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) in 2000 / 2001, prior to U.S. involvement in Afghanistan, the Taliban, working with the Afghan government had reduced Afghan poppy cultivation by 94% to a historic low of approximately 6,500 hectares.  Today, after nearly 10-years of U.S. military involvement and the vehement U.S.  war on drugs, Afghan poppy cultivation is now at a historic high of nearly 175,000 hectares and additionally,  the current per hectare yields are through the roof.  Does this strike you as rational, truthful leadership?… or does this factoid perhaps cause you to wonder “what are our children and many Afghan people dying for in Afghanistan”?
  • Afghanistan historically produces about 92% of the world’s poppies.  According to IMF, international money laundering totals between $590 billion and $1.5 trillion annually.  A significant portion of this unadvertised international banking business is derived from the world narcotics trade.  Is it rational to believe that the good intentions and generosity of the U.S. military and the American people are being used solely to promote freedom in the world, particularly Afghanistan?
  • In 1871 Albert Pike allegedly wrote a letter discussing the motivation and reasoning behind future World Wars I, II and III.  It matters not whether the letter was real.  It matters a great deal that the world’s international financial oligarchy was discussing this at all.  World War II was to establish the nation of Israel in the area known as Palestine.  WW III was to result directly from the Zionist / Arab conflict.  Is it rational that U.S. foreign policy insults our historic allies, particularly Israel, while embracing tyrannical dictatorships, such as Iran?
  • Prior to WW I all of Europe was bankrupt.  Not one European country was capable of financing a war.  The international banking oligarchy’s newly established Federal Reserve System in the U.S was used to finance all sides of WW I, including the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia and later the rise of Hitler in Germany.  Today all major countries in the world are aggressively courting bankruptcy, while the politically correct Islamo-facists terrorize the planet.  Is it rational to ignor the conversations of 1871?  Is the U.S. policy of engaging radical Islam, while agonizing over potential domestic (citizen) terrorists such as those who believe in the U.S. Constitution, embrace Christianity, support the 1st and 2nd Amendments as accepted U.S. law, or support the right to live of the unborn are now threatened by their own Federal government’s Dept. of Homeland Security rational?
  • Are you afraid to send honest emails or make open cell phone calls to your friends and associates?  Are you being added to one of Janet Napolitano’s enemies watch lists because you mentioned the Constitution in an email?  Does your elected House or Senate Representative care what you and the citizenry think?  Does your Federal government represent “we the people”  or some unseen international financial oligarchy?  Is any of this acceptable to you?  Is any of this rational or legal under U.S. Rule of Law?
  • George W. Bush fought for the Patriot Act and other new laws from his 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue bully pulpit.  Why do these laws state that to protect me from acts of terrorism, Habeas corpus is suspended;  I can be accused of terrorism, arrested and incarcerated without recourse, without any charges being filed – indefinitely.  How does this provision of the law make me safer?  Is this rational?  Is this acceptable under U.S. Rule of Law?  Why do we as citizens accept this form of legalized threat to our unalienable rights?
  • Why did the Bush 43 Administration destroy the 1878 Posse Comitatis Act, which prevents U.S. military from attacking its own citizens?  Is this rational?  Is this necessary for our protection?  In what way?
  • For two solid years of campaigning Barack Hussein Obama maligned the George W. Bush Administration policies on Guantanamo Bay, Afghanistan, over-spending and government intervention into and invasion of privacy.  Today Obama still runs Guantanamo Bay, has escalated the Afghan war even onto re-hiring Bush’s top General, has spent four times what the Bush Administration spent and has made a mockery of citizen privacy.  The press says nothing.  Is this rational leadership?  Do you honestly still believe the United States has a functional two-party system either of which represents your interests?
  • On January 22, 2009, just two days following the swearing in of Barack Hussein Obama, Congressman Hastings of Florida proposed H.R. 645, National Emergency Centers Establishment Act, which appropriates $180 billion for the construction of what are loosely termed “FEMA Camps”.   What are these camps for?  Is H.R. 645 rational?  How many of these camps have been built?  Where are these camps?  Who will be placed in these camps?  Who will guard these camps.  If these camps are to protect me, why do photos show double rows of concertina wire and guard towers – like any prison?  How does concertina wire protect citizens from flooding?  or from wind?  or from getting out?
  • If H.R. 645 is specious conspiracy theory, why does Haliburton claim contractual revenue of $2.5 billion to construct and mange existing FEMA camps?
  • Has the Supreme Court become a club for political hacks as opposed to a respected forum for Constitutional analysis? Is the Supreme Court capable, any longer, of acting in an objectively judicial manner in terms of “equal justice”?   Is this Court rational?

Are you beginning to suspect that your Federal government may be out of citizen control?  Is Washington D.C. so corrupt that it can no longer fix itself?  The answer is yes.  Washington D.C. and your corrupt Federal government has become too big to succeed.  The solution is State’s Rights.

Freedom To Do List:

Repeal the 17th Amendment.  States must appoint U.S. Senators for each State as written by the Founders in our Constitution.

Impose term limits and end the self agrandizement of career politicians.

Stop Re-districting (Gerry-mandering).  This is how 95% of corrupt,  incumbent Congressmen and women were reelected in 2008, in spite of 13% approval ratings.  Make your vote count.

Establish The Fair Tax.  End the IRS.  End The Federal Reserve System.

Enforce The Logan Act.  Make it illegal for international business cartels to influence American domestic and foreign policy through the back door.  Remove the criminal, international banking oligarchy from our political lives.

God Bless American Freedom!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s